Finally, the author identifies the practices that are used by universities, organizations, and in neuroleadership to teach these skills. The author argues that due to these challenges, a leader’s skill set must be easily adaptable, as required by the situational approach. The article compares the similarities and differences in leadership skills found in both Europe and the United States, as growing ambiguity and complexity of markets forces leaders to face frequent downturns. In addition, flexibility and being able to anticipate changes gives leaders the capacity to seamlessly transform between styles as needed. Mature cohorts in the workforce are being overtaken by millennials entering the force at a very rapid pace, already accounting for more than 50%, which in turn is demanding a quick shift in leadership that better adapts to the needs of followers. In this article, the author describes the optimal skills that leaders consider to be critical to the future of leadership. The scarcity of leaders that can properly assess situations and influence current and future generations, especially during difficult times, is setting back organizations and making them inadequate to keep up with volatility. This is not an example of the work written by our writers. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.This essay has been submitted to us by a student. Servant Leadership and Followership: Examining the Impact on Workplace Behavior. Servant leaders provide motivation for work while followers may not provide any form of motivation. In other words, servant leadership is for a collective purpose while followership is more for fulfillment of personal interests. Another difference is that servant leaders mainly focus on serving others while followers focus on accomplishing their set goals. Another expectation is for the leader to involve the followers in decision making in order to build a sense of trust.įollowers, on the other hand, develop goals and work towards achieving these goals. The leader is responsible for motivating the followers and giving them necessary support to accomplish their goals. Servant leadership and followership emphasize on different roles between the leader and the follower. Servant leadership and followership are nevertheless distinct in certain ways. In other words, the leader-follower relationship is more of a mutual bond where both parties benefit from one another. Followership in organizations helps to complement servant leadership. As servant leaders attempt to establish synergistic relations, the concept of followership holds that both leaders and followers are in an interdependent relationship.įollowers are not just passive participants in the relationship but also take an active role (Davis, 2017). On the contrary, servant leadership promotes synergies between organizational leaders and their followers. In the traditional style of leadership, organizational leaders were focused more on maintaining hierarchical relationships with followers. In organizational settings, servant leadership is evident in the nature of relations between leaders and employees. In servant leadership, the leader focuses on the well-being or growth of other individuals rather than the acquisition of power. Servant leadership refers to a model of leadership in which the leader has intrinsic motivation to serve others (Davis, 2017). This is a business assignment where the student is required to Compare and contrast followership and servant leadership.
0 kommentar(er)
